Instead, he and his handlers decided to ignore the intelligence given to them by the CIA and quote British intelligence that they had strong reason to suspect was not reliable, saying that as long as they quoted the British, it would be "factually accurate"... even if it wasn't the truth.
If it is a potentially impeachable offense to lie about an affair, what would you call knowingly presenting false, unreliable information to your country in order to provide a pretext for a war against another country? No matter whether you feel a war on Iraq was justifiable, there is no justification for a president to knowingly misrepresent the truth in such a manner.
Impeach now?! Sure... why not.
