Insomnia ([info]insomnia) wrote,

U2FU!

Paul "I want my fifteen percent!" McGuinness, longtime manager of the band U2, has called on Internet service providers to immediately introduce mandatory French-style service disconnection policies to end music downloading, and has urged governments to force ISPs to do so.

With an incendiary whine, McGuinness accused ISPs, telcos, device makers, and numerous Silicon Valley companies including Apple, Google, Facebook, Yahoo!, Oracle, etc. of building "multi billion dollar industries on the back of our content without paying for it", and accused them of being "makers of burglary kits" who have made "a thieve's charter" to steal money from the music industry. 

McGuinness called on high-tech companies to not just share ad revenue with them -- presumably for streamed but not downloaded  music -- but to also collect money across the board from consumers who use their sites, products, and services.

So, the next time that loud, obnoxious music loads automatically when you visit someone's MySpace site, just remember... you're a thief, and you're gonna pay for it!

Here, Mr McGuinness is seen recieving Ireland's "Pennypinching Bastard of the Year" Award, as he tries to describe the giant sucking sound that his vision of the Internet would bring to music fans.  

The entire text of his speech has been posted to the frontpage of U2's website.


  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 2 comments

[info]fengi

January 29 2008, 19:05:52 UTC 4 years ago

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but there's one valid point among all the crap.

I do think the most workable solution is profit sharing based on file transmission, paid by all companies who profit from the transmission or reading of content - legal or not (it's outrageous modern tech avoids the minimal fee applied to older recording devices with the data storage loophole). From devices to ISPs, paying all artists out there would be a minimal issue.

The problem would then shift to where it should be - ensuring money reaches the artists and not middlemen.

He turns it into crap with the idea of policing and involving major companies and organizations, which is more about continuing cashflow for those companies than making teh system work. If you established a usage based royalty system then you wouldn't need policing. In fact, any policing beyond making sure correctly identifying files (I can see a problem with fake traffic) would prevent the system from working.

I also like how he claims the Radiohead experiment proves people will steal music even when it is free.

[info]insomnia

January 29 2008, 20:32:27 UTC 4 years ago

It's not that there aren't potentially good solutions out there. It's that this guy is really, really wrong as far as his suggestions go.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…