Insomnia ([info]insomnia) wrote,
@ 2005-08-25 06:07:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Iraqi constitution in jeopardy..
Iraqi Sunni leaders, who reject many aspects of the new Iraqi constutution and are indignant about not being invited to many of the meetings where the constitution was finalized, are threatening to have the constitution declared illegal because the committee responsible failed to achieve a constitution by the legal deadline. (Juan Cole wrote about this a few days back.)

The concerns of the Sunni about the new constitution appear to be valid. One of the things the Sunni do not want is for the Kurds or the Shi'ites to monopolize oil revenues in the future. Currently, the plan is for oil revenues to be split based on current oil wells. Revenue from future oil wells would go to the particular region where the well is, however. Considering that the vast majority of Iraqi oil has not been drilled for yet, this would lead to a situation where the Sunnis are guaranteed to be cut out of most future oil income.

Meanwhile, the cold war between the major Shi'ite paramilitary groups has just heated up, and now Moqtada al-Sadr appears to be threatening to pull his support from the government. The fracas, which started with an attack on Sadr's followers in Najaf, has apparently spread, both in Baghdad, where the Badr Brigade HQ was attacked by Sadr supporters, and in Basra, where two missiles were fired at SCIRI headquarters, presumably by one of Sadr's supporters.

If the paramilitary groups declare open hunting, this could also throw a monkey wrench into approval of the Iraqi constitution... it could even lead to Sadr actively getting involved in the fighting again, possibly forming a common cause with the Sunni.

But that's okay because Donald Rumsfeld was just saying the other day that there won't be an Iraqi civil war, no matter how many dead bodies get pulled out of the river in Baghdad.

"I haven't seen anything to indicate that the risk is greater today than it was yesterday or the day before."

You don't *see* anything?! Pull your head out of your ass, Rummy!


(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]taosbat
2005-08-25 05:17 pm UTC (link)
I think Armando at DK nailed it--

Quoting the NYT, "The announcement that Parliament would miss the second extended deadline places the current government on uncertain legal authority. Under the rules that were agreed to last year the National Assembly is obliged to dissolve itself and hold new elections if it is unable to reach agreement on the interim constitution." Armando opines:
Believe it or not, I think this is good news. Certainly better than ramming through a constitution that is thoroughly flawed and one that excluded Sunni participation.

Let's hope they get a little more balance in a re-do.

(Reply to this)


[info]pope_guilty
2005-08-25 07:29 pm UTC (link)
I don't think civil war can be avoided.

(Reply to this)


[info]walkingshark
2005-08-26 02:11 am UTC (link)
Yep. Unless a leader can emerge from within Iraq to unite its disparate tribes (unlikely to the point of impossible) I don't see things working out. Especially since such a leader would probably be undermined by the administration because he would be too hard to control.

Basically, our only hope is for Saddam 2.0. How fucked up is that?

(Reply to this)


[info]silvertailfoxx
2005-08-26 09:08 am UTC (link)
I dont have much access to the news, I guess that because I am helping make it. *That and our "Stars and Stripes carrier" got sniped. Go figure.

But I hope that the constutution doesnt get passed. Because if it does, then I have to stay here in Ramadi for the security purpose. If it doesnt get passed, then in 6 months they can try again. Thats fine by me. I only have less than 3 months left.

(Reply to this)


(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…