Insomnia ([info]insomnia) wrote,
@ 2004-01-02 09:06:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Guess who's listening in...!
Cryptome.org just got an interesting new government-restricted document today on how the FBI does/can do surveilance on voice-over-IP calls. This is particularly of interest to me, in that I worked for a VoIP provider for quite awhile.

It's not easy reading unless you're used to this kind of stuff. It reads like a doc written by a telco expert which has been reviewed by lawyers, with the controversial bits left intentionally vague and full of acronyms.

For instance, the phrase...
"In CGVoP networks, certain key functionality and features are or could be provided by CPE."
...means that the FBI -- if they deem it techically useful or necessary -- will have "the talk" with the manufacturer of the phone/telco equipment in your house, in order to allow for the monitoring of your calls. Of course, similar features are built into switching and routing equipment as well, which is located in the local phone carrier's central offices. There is even a suggestion in the document that authentication between equipment in the customer's house and equipment in the central offices will not occur unless such features are in place.

This cooperation between telco businesses and government is required according to the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act. If you wondered why you never heard about CALEA, it is probably because it was rushed through congress in the last night of the 1994 congressional session, with no real public debate or input on the matter.

One has to wonder how these security issues play out. Do overseas customers "import" US security by default? Can organizations like the NSA or the CIA use it for spying on people? Are these features enabled in hardware or in software? Can they be bypassed? Questions, questions...


(2 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]perse
2004-01-02 12:25 pm UTC (link)
Big Brother is Watching is never an overexaggeration.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I consider myself a realist and I believe that wherever power can be abused, it will be - when it comes to the government, that is.

The thing that pisses me off is not that they passed the legislation - because quite frankly, I think that with or without the legislation they'd still be doing it, only it would be inadmissible as evidence - but that they use OUR tax dollars to do that shit. That pisses me off even more (which is saying a lot) than the fact that they're using our tax dollars on a war.


It just all goes to show that just like unionizers and political activists have always thought, they really are being watched. Essentially there is no safe form of communication other than face to face, and even that is questionable in a lot of places.

It would not surprise me in the least if those who were willing to express political dissent would eventually be forced - out of necessity - to disseminate such information only through the physical written word (as opposed to online), and then only anonymously.

It pisses me off.

(Reply to this)

serious question/s
[info]scientaestubiqu
2004-01-03 12:19 am UTC (link)
I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just confused.

does America want the rest of the world NOT to do business with them?

because a lot of new American laws don't seem to be taking international economic factors into account.

Australian banks can't use Microsoft Windows under it's regular license agreement because it breaches Australian privacy law.

this kind of stuff is having an effect on the US economy (but hey, it's great for the Aussie dollar!)

Many countries outside the US have consumer protection laws and privacy laws.

Are American businesses worried about being chased out of the marketplace for legal reasons?

or is the US market considered big enough?

(Reply to this)


(2 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…